Very happy to see experts honestly debating about complex problems. This would never have happened during my time as a student when arrogance was basically the rule ;)
ads-cft does not address the world we are living in. So why is so much time and energy spent on this except for the self-satisfaction with having quasi-solvable math problems (your interview with Lenny..). Joe sid string theory (whatever that is) is not a description of the fundamental laws of Our Universe. So what’s the use? To say ST will have an impact in 2-300 years does point to something wrong with it, right? If nature is so complicated at the base, I think the human mind will unlikely find the fundamental principles. One of my physics teachers once told me that if you have a complicated way to explain something, you do not understand it (yet).
Also, how do we measure the superiority of a theory without experimental evidence (even in the next 100s down the timeline)? If it is self-consistency, then all you get is epsilon’s ‘progress’ with respect to existing ones. Beauty? This is appealing but not intellectually satisfactory in accounting for the laws of physics we know if it does not have explanatory power. This raises the question: what is the purpose of physics or even science? I like the idea that we are curious beings at the core, and we do physics not only for explaining something, but to have the satisfaction to dig the deeper realm of reality.
What do I have to do to get you to look at my work? You are certainly smart enough to understand the nature of the current theoretical impasse. And why the current approaches to unification aren’t up to the task.
The following is a link to the gauging mechanism responsible for the emergence of quantum phenomena which function as the fundamental building components of all physical structures observed in the biosphere. This emergence is intentionally and intelligently designed, initiated, and orchestrated, and thereby mathematically understood using Newtonian mechanics and is not the result of random processing as currently conceived by academic science using stochastic methodology. It defines quantum gravity as the symmetric differential force component of a quantum isotropic stress tensor at the Hubble rate generated by concentration of inertial density.
Very happy to see experts honestly debating about complex problems. This would never have happened during my time as a student when arrogance was basically the rule ;)
ads-cft does not address the world we are living in. So why is so much time and energy spent on this except for the self-satisfaction with having quasi-solvable math problems (your interview with Lenny..). Joe sid string theory (whatever that is) is not a description of the fundamental laws of Our Universe. So what’s the use? To say ST will have an impact in 2-300 years does point to something wrong with it, right? If nature is so complicated at the base, I think the human mind will unlikely find the fundamental principles. One of my physics teachers once told me that if you have a complicated way to explain something, you do not understand it (yet).
Also, how do we measure the superiority of a theory without experimental evidence (even in the next 100s down the timeline)? If it is self-consistency, then all you get is epsilon’s ‘progress’ with respect to existing ones. Beauty? This is appealing but not intellectually satisfactory in accounting for the laws of physics we know if it does not have explanatory power. This raises the question: what is the purpose of physics or even science? I like the idea that we are curious beings at the core, and we do physics not only for explaining something, but to have the satisfaction to dig the deeper realm of reality.
What do I have to do to get you to look at my work? You are certainly smart enough to understand the nature of the current theoretical impasse. And why the current approaches to unification aren’t up to the task.
The following is a link to the gauging mechanism responsible for the emergence of quantum phenomena which function as the fundamental building components of all physical structures observed in the biosphere. This emergence is intentionally and intelligently designed, initiated, and orchestrated, and thereby mathematically understood using Newtonian mechanics and is not the result of random processing as currently conceived by academic science using stochastic methodology. It defines quantum gravity as the symmetric differential force component of a quantum isotropic stress tensor at the Hubble rate generated by concentration of inertial density.
https://uniservent.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Defining-a-unification-gauge-on-the-inertial-field-rev-113024.pdf