Does Neil and his group's idea also resolve the excess of matter over antimatter issue? In other words, does the mirror universe contain an excess of antimatter that exactly balances
Only halfway, but indeed, that would be (among the) first question(s). (Others, obv., are Dark Gravity and Dark Repulsion (`if you know what I mean` ∧ `you know what I mean" ;).)
Your body would be pulled into a string that gets finer and finer until it’s nothing but quanta. This may take millions of years, but for you, time has slowed down to almost a halt. As time gets slower and slower, less and less change happens. That’s why it takes millions of years. At some point, all your molecules and atoms are compressed so tightly that the electromagnetic force is under compression . You take up almost no space. You are pretty much just quantized information, but under incredible compression. The electromagnetic force is pushing back and seeks to be released. In this state, the quanta can appear again almost anywhere. It doesn’t have to be local to where the black hole that you fell into is. It’s likely to be millions of light years away. But eventually, it unleashes all of that compressed energy back into the universe in the form of a petty big bang. This system is like water. It is totally conserved and recycled over and over again endlessly in the infinite universe.
Here is the reason why all of these dualistic properties arise out of quantum mechanics.
People don't understand how QM came from the "math". The language of QM is based upon the character/symbol i (the "imaginary unit") that possesses a magical property. This property requires it to be in a "superconceptual state" of possessing both the + and the - simultaneously. The mathematician gets to choose which variation of the equation was used to solve for the square root of -1.
If you are able to see through the programming that is "learning math", the following explains all of the "quantum weirdness".
If it is possible that the scientific contraptions that verify the mathematical predictions, are PROJECTING rather than DECTECTING, this explains why there are no subatomic particles "out there" prior to "seeing" them on the display of a technological device.
If everything entering a black mirror is annihilated by its anti-self, how does the black mirror have mass and grow? And I didn’t hear anything about how a black mirror forms.
If I understand correctly, in the CPT-symmetric Universe, our cosmos and its “anti-universe” are born simultaneously at the Big Bang: each moment on our side has a mirror image with all charges, spatial orientations, and the direction of time reversed.
Much later, when a massive star collapses, the object we see from the outside looks exactly like a black hole, but at the horizon space-time is glued to its CPT copy instead of opening into a singular interior. This creates a black mirror.
Because the CPT-reflected sheet already exists, the partner that falls in from the mirror side carries positive energy. Charges cancel globally, but the gravitational mass doubles: both energy fluxes cross the common horizon before they annihilate, so the external mass parameter still increases exactly as for an ordinary black hole. Only the later Hawking-like emission can make the mirror shrink again.
Because the anti-universe already exists, the “far side” of the black mirror does not need to accrete extra mass: it simply provides the CPT partner for whatever falls in on our side.
Curt – I watched your YouTube video on black mirrors and then I read the professor Turok’s paper on black mirrors in the Arxiv . I was left puzzled by how a black mirror could grow if there is no way to get anything inside of it. Does the black mirror grow when more radiation produced from infalling matter is orbiting it? What happens to orbiting radiation when the mirror radius grows from accretion but the radiation was orbiting that mirror when it had a smaller radius?
I see he is well on track in the right direction - from separated mirror universes towards the interlaced repetition of antipodal rhythm at all event points in space-time. Now we are in the scale of black holes...
I have the only possible resolution. I know why reality theotics has stalled. There is a no-win "Kobayashi Maru" condition that has prohibited the development of final comprehensive model.
Or at least there WAS until my theory reprogrammed the language model to eliminate the bias toward physics and materialism.
Does Neil and his group's idea also resolve the excess of matter over antimatter issue? In other words, does the mirror universe contain an excess of antimatter that exactly balances
the excess of matter in ours?
Only halfway, but indeed, that would be (among the) first question(s). (Others, obv., are Dark Gravity and Dark Repulsion (`if you know what I mean` ∧ `you know what I mean" ;).)
What happens if you fall into a black hole?
Your body would be pulled into a string that gets finer and finer until it’s nothing but quanta. This may take millions of years, but for you, time has slowed down to almost a halt. As time gets slower and slower, less and less change happens. That’s why it takes millions of years. At some point, all your molecules and atoms are compressed so tightly that the electromagnetic force is under compression . You take up almost no space. You are pretty much just quantized information, but under incredible compression. The electromagnetic force is pushing back and seeks to be released. In this state, the quanta can appear again almost anywhere. It doesn’t have to be local to where the black hole that you fell into is. It’s likely to be millions of light years away. But eventually, it unleashes all of that compressed energy back into the universe in the form of a petty big bang. This system is like water. It is totally conserved and recycled over and over again endlessly in the infinite universe.
Prove me wrong.
Here is the reason why all of these dualistic properties arise out of quantum mechanics.
People don't understand how QM came from the "math". The language of QM is based upon the character/symbol i (the "imaginary unit") that possesses a magical property. This property requires it to be in a "superconceptual state" of possessing both the + and the - simultaneously. The mathematician gets to choose which variation of the equation was used to solve for the square root of -1.
If you are able to see through the programming that is "learning math", the following explains all of the "quantum weirdness".
If it is possible that the scientific contraptions that verify the mathematical predictions, are PROJECTING rather than DECTECTING, this explains why there are no subatomic particles "out there" prior to "seeing" them on the display of a technological device.
You guys gotta fucking listen to me!
https://roydopson.substack.com/p/what-quantum-mechanics-really-is
If everything entering a black mirror is annihilated by its anti-self, how does the black mirror have mass and grow? And I didn’t hear anything about how a black mirror forms.
I think the answer is here
https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/2412.09558
If I understand correctly, in the CPT-symmetric Universe, our cosmos and its “anti-universe” are born simultaneously at the Big Bang: each moment on our side has a mirror image with all charges, spatial orientations, and the direction of time reversed.
Much later, when a massive star collapses, the object we see from the outside looks exactly like a black hole, but at the horizon space-time is glued to its CPT copy instead of opening into a singular interior. This creates a black mirror.
Because the CPT-reflected sheet already exists, the partner that falls in from the mirror side carries positive energy. Charges cancel globally, but the gravitational mass doubles: both energy fluxes cross the common horizon before they annihilate, so the external mass parameter still increases exactly as for an ordinary black hole. Only the later Hawking-like emission can make the mirror shrink again.
Because the anti-universe already exists, the “far side” of the black mirror does not need to accrete extra mass: it simply provides the CPT partner for whatever falls in on our side.
Curt – I watched your YouTube video on black mirrors and then I read the professor Turok’s paper on black mirrors in the Arxiv . I was left puzzled by how a black mirror could grow if there is no way to get anything inside of it. Does the black mirror grow when more radiation produced from infalling matter is orbiting it? What happens to orbiting radiation when the mirror radius grows from accretion but the radiation was orbiting that mirror when it had a smaller radius?
I see he is well on track in the right direction - from separated mirror universes towards the interlaced repetition of antipodal rhythm at all event points in space-time. Now we are in the scale of black holes...
I show WHY NONE OF THESE ISSUES RESOLVED and WHY ALL OF THESE DUALITIES POP UP ALL OVER THE PLACE
LISTEN TO ME!
https://open.substack.com/pub/roydopson/p/i-understand-reality-better-than?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1y5bkg
I have the only possible resolution. I know why reality theotics has stalled. There is a no-win "Kobayashi Maru" condition that has prohibited the development of final comprehensive model.
Or at least there WAS until my theory reprogrammed the language model to eliminate the bias toward physics and materialism.
Curt you need to interview me.